
Almost 40% of everything released in July shows traces of a machine: a detector checked a million records
23.2% of July releases were fully generated, another 15.3% were machine audio a human then processed. And a third of the artists whose music tested positive said they had used nothing of the kind.
Almost 40% of the music released worldwide last month shows signs of a machine's involvement. More than a million July releases were run through SubmitHub's SH Labs detector: 23.2% came back fully generated, and another 15.3% were machine-made audio that a human had "modified or processed".
The study was covered by Mixmag.
SubmitHub unveiled the detector in June, framing the job not as a hunt for AI but as a response to a "growing disclosure problem".
"I think the path forward for AI music is disclosure. People should be able to decide for themselves whether they want to engage with AI-generated music. Our job is to give them enough information to make that choice," said SubmitHub founder Jason Grishkoff.
A third say there was no AI
The study's most uncomfortable number is not about machines but about people. Among artists whose releases tested positive this year, 31% told the platform, when asked directly, that they had used no such tools at all.
That is the "disclosure problem" in one line: the question is not whether you may make music with a machine, but whether you will say so. Until someone says so, the choice Grishkoff wants to leave to the listener has nothing to work with.
Who already uses the detector
SH Labs is used by Bandcamp and Traxsource, and by the German collecting society GEMA — the same body that won its case against the generator Suno in July. A tool born inside a song-pitching service has become part of the infrastructure that stores and rightsholders now lean on.
As reported earlier by ONE//FM, a Munich court found that Suno had no right to train its models on music represented by GEMA.









Comments
Loading…